Journal Information

Contributors are requested to carefully adhere to the following guidelines when submitting manuscripts for this journal.

• Clear formulation of outcome-oriented Research Objective/s for targeted knowledge (sub)domain/s or (sub)discipline/s.
• Selection and comprehensive summarization of appropriate Research Method/s adopted to achieve the stated Research Objective/s.
• Reporting a sound (Empirical) Evaluation of the research finding/s thereby arguing reliability, validity, and generalizability of research claim/s.

Categories of manuscripts

Structure of Manuscripts

• Running title: Should be a shortened title (limited to a maximum of 50 characters) that could be printed at the top of every other page of the Journal
• Abstract: Should be between 200 - 250 words for full length articles and written as a single paragraph. It should not contain any references and should carry a summary of not more than 300 words. should be able to stand on its own. It should outline objectives and methodology together with important results and conclusions. A Review Article should carry words or phrases relevant to the study.
• Keywords: Include a maximum of six keywords, which may include the names of organisms (common or scientific), methods or other important words or phrases relevant to the study
• Introduction: This should state the reasons for performing the work with a brief review of related research studies in the context of the work described in the paper. Objectives of the study should be clearly stated.
• Materials and Methods: This section should give the details of how you conducted your study. New methods may be described in detail with an indication of their limitations. Established methods can be mentioned with appropriate references. Sufficient details should be included to allow direct repetition of the work by others. Where human subjects are involved, they should be referred to by numbers or fictitious names. A paper reporting the results of investigations on human subjects or on animals must include a statement to the effect that the relevant national or other administrative and ethical guidelines have been adhered to, and a copy of the ethical clearance certificate should be submitted. Methods of statistical analyses used should be mentioned where relevant.
• Results and Discussion: Results: the results should be concisely and logically presented. Repetition of the same results in figures, tables or text Discussion: data essential for the conclusions emerging from the study should be discussed. Long, rambling discussions should be avoided. The discussion should deal with the interpretation of results. It should logically relate new findings to earlier ones. Unqualified statements and conclusions not completely supported by data should be avoided.
• Conclusion: The conclusion should be brief, highlight the outcomes of the study and should be aligned with the objectives of the study. It should not contain references.
• Conflict of interest statement: All authors should include a statement on conflict of interest disclosing any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their research. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
• Acknowledgement: Should be brief and made for specific scientific, financial and technical assistance only. If a significant part of the research was performed in an institution other than in those indicated by the authors' affiliations given in the title page, this fact should be acknowledged. All those who have made substantial contribution to the research but do not qualify to be authors should be acknowledged.
• References: All research work of other authors, when used or referred to or cited, should be correctly acknowledged in the text and in the References.